Twin Cities Plan for a Future With More People, Fewer Cars - Next City

Los Angeles and New York will be strained by population growth over the next 40 years, but the Twin Cities region has them both beat, and is expecting to gain roughly 800,000 new residents by 2040. What that means for the region’s transportation network — at least with current ownership rates — is a whopping 675,000 more personal vehicles on the road with all their associated CO2, congestion and social inequity.

With the help of the Shared-Use Mobility Center and the McKnight foundation, among others, regional officials have released a plan to get that vehicle number down. More specifically, they aim to remove 50,000 private cars from regional roads over the next 10 years.

From the document:

In recent years, the region has made notable improvements to its public transit system, including launching bus rapid transit service and building a new Green Line light rail route that helped to “re-twin” the Twin Cities. It was also an early pioneer in bike-sharing, car-sharing and other forms of shared mobility. However, it has lost some ground lately, while peer cities such as Seattle and Denver have been scaling shared mobility and transit on a remarkable level — and attracting millennials who are less interested in owning cars than previous generations and more inclined to seek out walkable, amenity-rich urban environments.

In the short-term, the plan aims to take 20,000 cars off the roads over the next five years with a combination of strategies — by attracting 30,000 new daily transit riders (through new rail capital projects and improvements to BRT and rapid bus lines), sustaining 600 vehicles in car-sharing programs, adding 800 bike-share bikes to the current Nice Ride MN network (for 2,500 bikes total) and adding 1,000 daily vanpool users, among other efforts.

More broadly, it tasks officials with growing shared mobility options to complement the fixed transit network, among other strategies — and engage in a whole lot of first/last mile planning. That could include investing in infrastructure that supports those shared options, like turning transit stations into mobility hubs or reserving space for shared services in light rail and bus stations, as well as spending significant staff time and money on exploring public-private partnerships with shared-use providers. Such partnerships are increasingly sought after (and shied away from) by city governments in the U.S.

Click here to read the full article: